Towards MapReduce based Bayesian deep learning network for monitoring big data applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most commonly used ways to monitor execution of software applications is by analyzing logs. Logs are execution foot-print of software applications that are produced and stored for real-time or post-execution analysis of execution. With the software applications becoming large, complex, distributed, web-scale, also called as big data applications, logs produced by such software applications are also large-scale. That means, such logs are large in volume, velocity and variety. That makes it crucial to have such logs analyzed in an automated, scalable and effective manner to ensure high veracity and have analytics with high value. In this paper, we present our proposed solution of a formal model for organizing and structuring logs. We then present a Bayesian deep learning network based analysis approach that utilizes the formal model for logs to detect and predict any possible faults and consequences of such faults. Moreover, we also present our MapReduce based distributed, parallel, single-pass and incremental approach to build, train and execute the proposed Bayesian deep learning framework. This helps in effective processing of logs on cloud platforms and therefore efficient handling of logs that are produced at the scale of big data by big data applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it