MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783230096 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2017.8254648

Delay-QoS Aware Adaptive Resource Allocations for Free Space Optical Fronthaul Networks

2017· article· en· W2783230096 on OpenAlex
Md. Zoheb Hassan, Victor C. M. Leung, Md. Jahangir Hossain, Julian Cheng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceResource allocationTransmitter power outputOptimization problemComputer networkMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsTransmitterChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statistical delay quality-of-service (QoS) aware adaptive resource allocation scheme is proposed for a multi-carrier coherent free space optical (FSO) communications based fronthaul network. The proposed resource allocation assigns remote radio heads (RRHs) to the suitable aggregation nodes (ANs) and allocates the transmit power to the orthogonal optical carriers. Specifically, the proposed resource allocation provides delay-QoS at the link layer by maximizing the effective sum capacity of the all the RRHs subject to transmit power budgets at the RRHs and capacity constraint of the wired fronthaul links connecting the ANs with the baseband unit (BBU) pool. The considered resource allocation is formulated as a mixed-integer non-linear programing (MINLP) problem. We use two transmission link optimization techniques, namely, independent link optimization (ILO) and joint link optimization (JLO), in order to solve the proposed MINLP problem. Under both optimization techniques, the proposed MINLP problem is decomposed into two subproblems which are iteratively solved in order to obtain the optical transmit power allocation and assignments of RRHs to the ANs. Our analysis reveals that the optical transmit power allocation and RRH-AN assignments depend on both the atmospheric turbulence fading and delay-QoS requirements. Numerical results demonstrate that the JLO technique achieves significant higher effective capacity (EC) compared to the ILO technique in the strict statistical delay-QoS constraints. However, the EC performance gap between the JLO and ILO techniques is reduced in the loose statistical delay-QoS constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it