MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783251003 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2018.2789344

Distributed Opportunistic Spectrum Access in an Unknown and Dynamic Environment: A Stochastic Learning Approach

2018· article· en· W2783251003 on OpenAlexaff
Huijin Cao, Jun Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePotential gameNash equilibriumLearning automataOverhead (engineering)Mathematical optimizationGame theoryDistributed computingConvergence (economics)Optimization problemAutomatonTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the problem of distributed throughput maximization in an opportunistic spectrum access network with multiple secondary users (SUs) and multiple primary channels is investigated. To address the challenges in designing efficient solutions in a dynamic and unknown environment, we formulate the optimization problem as a noncooperative game, which is further proved to be an ordinal potential game. We then propose a best-response-based algorithm to achieve the Nash equilibrium points (NEPs) of the formulated game, given that there exists a coordinator for SUs to work in a round-robin fashion and a common control channel for SUs to exchange their information. To further relieve the system overhead due to information exchange among SUs, we design a new stochastic learning automata (SLA)-based algorithm, called N-SLA, which can converge to the pure-strategy NEPs of the formulated ordinal potential game in a fully distributed way. To our best knowledge, we are the first to address the convergence issue of the SLA-based algorithms for general ordinal potential games. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207