MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783287872 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2017-0681

Behavior of a vacuum and naked singularity under a smooth gauge function in Lyra geometry

2018· article· en· W2783287872 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haizhao Zhi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Differential Geometry Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNaked singularitySingularityGauge theoryGeometryGauge (firearms)Dimension functionDifferential geometryFunction (biology)Conformal mapConformal geometryMathematical physicsSpace (punctuation)Classical mechanicsMathematical analysisConformal symmetryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lyra geometry is a conformal geometry that originated from Weyl geometry. In this article, we derive the exterior field equation under a spherically symmetric gauge function x0(r) and metric in Lyra geometry. When we impose a specific form of the gauge function x0(r), the radial differential equation of the metric component g00 will possess an irregular singular point (ISP) at r = 0. Moreover, we can apply the method of dominant balance to get the asymptotic behavior of the new space–time solution. The significance of this work is that we can use a series of smooth gauge functions x0(r) to modulate the degree of divergence of the singularity at r = 0, which will become a naked singularity under certain conditions. Furthermore, we investigate the physical meaning of this novel behavior of space–time in Lyra geometry and find out that no spaceship with finite integrated acceleration can arrive at this singularity at r = 0. The physical meaning of the gauge function and integrability is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Differential Geometry ResearchFrench-language works237,207