MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783326523 · doi:10.4171/jems/1015

Circular law for sparse random regular digraphs

2020· preprint· en· W2783326523 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Mathematical Society · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCircular lawAdjacency matrixMathematicsCombinatoricsRandom matrixDiscrete mathematicsDirected graphBounding overwatchMatrix (chemical analysis)Random variableGraphConvergence of random variablesEigenvalues and eigenvectorsStatisticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fix a constant C\geq 1 and let d=d(n) satisfy d\leq \mathrm {ln}^{C} n for every large integer n . Denote by A_n the adjacency matrix of a uniform random directed d -regular graph on n vertices. We show that if d\to\infty as n \to \infty , the empirical spectral distribution of the appropriately rescaled matrix A_n converges weakly in probability to the circular law. This result, together with an earlier work of Cook, completely settles the problem of weak convergence of the empirical distribution in a directed d -regular setting with the degree tending to infinity. As a crucial element of our proof, we develop a technique of bounding intermediate singular values of A_n based on studying random normals to rowspaces and on constructing a product structure to deal with the lack of independence between matrix entries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it