A Centralized Clustering Based Hybrid Vehicular Networking Architecture for Safety Data Delivery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clustering has been extensively used in Vehicular Ad- hoc NETworks (VANETs) for routing optimization and radio resource management, and continues to be considered to facilitate data dissemination in heterogeneous vehicular networks with the ever- increasing data traffic demands. Most of the existing clustering mechanisms in VANETs operate in a distributed mode. However, there is redundant control overhead and transmission decisions, such as cluster maintenance, parameter tuning and forwarding scheduling, which are costly in distributed modes. In this paper, a centralized clustering based hybrid vehicular networking architecture (CC-HVNA) is proposed, in which the collaborative control between IEEE 802.11p and LTE is realized to achieve clustering and to coordinate message delivery. In CC-HVNA, a volatile node state SN is set to reflect ever-changing network topology and to update clusters. Location-based Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) communications are utilized to gather regional information so as to perform centralized clusters partition and maintain cluster info table in infrastructures. We leverage a control center to integrate cluster info from the Evolved Node (eNodeB) and Road Side Units (RSUs). Owing to the possession of global cluster info, cluster changes can be detected and targeted data dissemination can be supported according to content-oriented service. The performance evaluation demonstrates that the proposed CC-HVNA clustering scheme can achieve a significant improvement of safety data dissemination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".