MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783427655

Stock Assessment of Heavybeak Parrotfish Scarus gibbus (Ruppell, 1829) (Family: Scaridae) off Tuticorin Coast, India (08°53.6’N, 78°16’E and 08°53.8’N, 78°32’E) – 36M

2017· article· en· W2783427655 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
T. Vaitheeswaran, V. K. Venkataramani

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aquaculture · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParrotfishFishingFisheryOverfishingBiologyFish measurementCoral reefAnimal scienceFish <Actinopterygii>
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The commercial important coral reef fishes viable source, re-aggregating, have been exploited coral reef parrot fish in pears coast of Gulf of Mannar. Its beautifully colour parrot fish reported between ranges 08°53.6’N, 78°16’E and 08°53.8’N, 78°32’E at a depth of 36 m. The parrot fishing of natural mortality (M), fishing mortality (F) and total mortality (Z) was calculated at 0.47, 0.40 and 0.87, respectively. Growth equation based on modified von Bertalanffy’s equation and Ford-Walford graph was arrived. The growth parameters such as L∞ = 104.50 cm and K = 0.23 was estimated combining both sexes. Length and weight frequency data obtained from the growth equation, has been dealing with S. gibbus attains the length of 21.96, 39.21, 51.76, 62.74, 70.58, 77.64 and 83.13 mm during first and seventh year respectively. The spawning peaks one in December and another in April could be observed. The life span of S. gibbus was estimated for seven years. The exploitation ratio of 0.46 indicated that the resource of S. gibbus is currently exploited along the Tuticorin coast. Heavy fishing pressure on the length group 6 to 81 cm revealed that S. gibbus in Tuticorin waters suffer due to recruitment overfishing. The present level of exploitation rate and exploitation ratio (F/Z) is estimated at 0.46 and 0.5 respectively. The average length of parrot fish, the beginning capture (Lc) was calculated as 20.0 cm. The total stock, average annual stock and maximum sustainable yield were estimated as 35.150 tonnes, 9.385 tonnes and 10.206 tonnes respectively. Virtual Population Analysis have been assessing the mortality ranges from 85 cm. The parrot fish study shows that the further stressed that strict management measures need to be undertaken to conserve this species from further to avoid exploitation and to restore the biodiversity of heavybeak parrotfish population of Gulf of Mannar in general and Tuticorin coast in particular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AquacultureSame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207