MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783465415 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2017.8254072

Joint Resource Allocation and Online Virtual Network Embedding for 5G Networks

2017· article· en· W2783465415 on OpenAlexaff
Junling Li, Ning Zhang, Qiang Ye, Weisen Shi, Weihua Zhuang, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkNetwork virtualizationHeterogeneous networkWireless networkVirtualizationVirtual networkCore networkIP Multimedia SubsystemResource allocationDistributed computingRadio resource managementWirelessQuality of serviceTelecommunicationsCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Next generation (5G) wireless networks are expected to accommodate proliferation of connected devices and multimedia services. To support multimedia services in an agile, cost-effective, and flexible way, network virtualization is a potential solution. This paper investigates service- oriented network virtualization for 5G wireless networks, to efficiently allocate heterogeneous resources to accommodate multimedia services. Specifically, we study joint resource allocation for virtual network requests (VNRs) and online embedding the resultant VNRs in core networks (CNs). With the deployment of multiple traffic aggregation points (TAPs) in radio access networks (RANs), the end-to- end traffic from heterogeneous access technologies can be aggregated and then grouped based on their destinations. Queueing models are developed in determining the minimal capacity required at each core network element. Virtual network embedding (VNE) in the core network is further proposed to achieve efficient physical resource sharing in CNs. Simulation results validate the VNE process in core networks based on the optimized capacities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207