MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783472323

HYPHENATED IDENTITY AND MYTHS OF WORLD CREATION LEAD TO A HAPPY ENDING, IN HIROMI GOTO’S CHORUS OF MUSHROOMS

2017· article· en· W2783472323 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luciano da Silva Cabral

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Estudos Anglo-Americanos · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJapanese History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtChorusLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chorus of Mushrooms , de Hiromi Goto, traz a tona os efeitos da diaspora sobre tres mulheres de tres diferentes geracoes. Naoe, japonesa forcada a migrar para o Canada devido a Segunda Guerra Mundial, recusa-se a usar o idioma de seu novo pais e passa os dias calada, sentada numa poltrona. Keiko, ao contrario, adota um nome ocidental e abraca completamente os costumes canadenses. Seu repudio a cultura oriental leva-a a esquecer sua lingua nativa. O antagonismo materializado nestas duas personagens e, no entanto, apaziguado pela protagonista Murasaki, a jovem narradora que assume o papel de amalgama das culturas canadense e japonesa. Conforme cresce, ela passa a interessar-se por sua identidade hifenizada. Simbolo de uma certa aceitacao diasporico, Murasaki renomeia a si mesma e assim aproxima-se deliberadamente de suas raizes orientais. Com isso, ao recontar os mitos de criacao do Japao, ela os reforma e os reorganiza, dando abertura para novas combinacoes e interpretacoes. Tal atitude diminui a inquietacao e o temor causado pela diaspora, reconcilia os membros de sua familia e proporciona um final feliz para o romance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.030
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Estudos Anglo-AmericanosSame topicJapanese History and CultureFrench-language works237,207