MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783485024 · doi:10.1107/s2056989017018564

Further investigation on the nitration of BODIPY with cupric nitrate: crystal structures of 4,4-difluoro-1,3,5,7,8-pentamethyl-2-nitro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-<i>s</i>-indacene, 4,4-difluoro-3-nitro-8-phenyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-<i>s</i>-indacene, and 3-chloro-6-ethyl-5,7,8-trimethyl-2-nitro-4,4-diphenyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-<i>s</i>-indacene

2018· article· en· W2783485024 on OpenAlexafffund
D.J. Joshi, Mee Sook Jun, Lijing Yang, Alan J. Lough, Hongbin Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryNitrationNitroRing (chemistry)Dihedral angleCrystal structureMoleculeBODIPYHydrogen bondCrystal (programming language)CrystallographyMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistryFluorescencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The treatment of non-fully substituted 4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza- s -indacene (BODIPY) with cupric nitrate leads to the introduction of a nitro group at different positions of the BODIPY core, depending on the substitution pattern. This methodology complements the treatment of fully substituted BODIPY with cupric nitrate that was previously reported. The crystal structures of 4,4-difluoro-1,3,5,7,8-pentamethyl-2-nitro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza- s -indacene, C 14 H 16 BF 2 N 3 O 2 ( 5a ) 4,4-difluoro-3-nitro-8-phenyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza- s -indacene, C 15 H 10 BF 2 N 3 O 2 (5b ) and 3-chloro-6-ethyl-5,7,8-trimethyl-2-nitro-4,4-diphenyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza- s -indacene, C 26 H 25 BClN 3 O 2 ( 5d ) are presented. In all three structures, the fused ring system is in a very flattened `V-shape', with dihedral angles between the two outer five membered rings of 8.12 (14), 6.67 (9) and 12.30 (18) Å for 5a , 5b and 5d , respectively. In each case, the central six-membered ring is in a flattened sofa conformation. In the crystal of 5a , molecules are linked by weak C—H...O and C—H...F hydrogen bonds forming sheets parallel to (10-1). In the crystal of 5b molecules are linked by weak C—H...O and C—H...F hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions forming sheets parallel to (001). In the crystal of 5d , weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds link molecules into chains along [001]. In compound 5d , the atoms of the nitro group were refined as disordered over two sets of sites with occupancies 0.618 (12) and 0.382 (12).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207