MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783493190 · doi:10.3968/10036

Contribution of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in the Analysis of Parasitic Diseases: The Example of the Malaria in the City of Bouaké in Côte d’Ivoire

2017· article· en· W2783493190 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maimouna Ymba

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalariaGeographyGeographic information systemAnopheles gambiaeAnophelesCote d ivoireSocioeconomicsParasitic diseaseCartographyEnvironmental healthDemographyDiseaseBiologyMedicineImmunologyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malaria is the most widespread parasitic disease in the world and the most deadly parasitosis in tropical regions. Using a Geographic Information System integrating epidemiologic, entomologic, socio-demographic, cartographic, positioning Global Positioning System (GPS) data and information from satellite images, the objective of this study is to identify areas at risk of malaria transmission as well as their determinants. Our results highlighted spaces at malaria risks and allowed to distinguish two major categories of larval lodges, humid shallows and paddy fields in Bouake where the number of Anopheles An. Gambiae was significantly higher ( p <0.001). Moreover, it was also observed an absolute link between the level of parasitic load of the north-west and north-east neighborhoods and level of malaria prevalence ( p = 0.0275).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207