MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783567705 · doi:10.1109/icdim.2017.8244646

Analysis and compliance evaluation of cookies-setting websites with privacy protection laws

2017· article· en· W2783567705 on OpenAlex
Adeyemi Aladeokin, Pavol Zavarsky, Neelam Memon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreConcordia University of Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthInternet privacyCompliance (psychology)The InternetPrivacy laws of the United StatesBusinessInformation privacyData Protection Act 1998Privacy protectionSample (material)Privacy policyInformation privacy lawComputer securityLawComputer sciencePolitical scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of cookies to profile individuals has been raising serious privacy protection concerns. Many countries have already enacted privacy protection laws to create legal framework to mitigate these concerns. This paper presents an analysis of setting of cookies on users' computers by websites in a sample of Commonwealth countries, and evaluates compliance of the cookies-setting websites with privacy protection laws of the countries where the websites are hosted. Also, the rate at which third-party cookies are being set was monitored and the findings were used to estimate probability of a user's Internet activities being tracked on the websites in the Commonwealth countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207