MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783583498 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201705537

New Strategy for Polysulfide Protection Based on Atomic Layer Deposition of TiO<sub>2</sub> onto Ferroelectric‐Encapsulated Cathode: Toward Ultrastable Free‐Standing Room Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Batteries

2018· article· en· W2783583498 on OpenAlexaff
Dingtao Ma, Yongliang Li, Jingbo Yang, Hongwei Mi, Shan Luo, Libo Deng, Chaoyi Yan, Muhammad Rauf, Peixin Zhang, Xueliang Sun, Xiangzhong Ren, Jianqing Li, Han Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMaterials scienceCathodeAmorphous solidAtomic layer depositionElectrochemistryElectrodeLayer (electronics)Chemical engineeringDeposition (geology)SulfurPolysulfideNanotechnologyEnergy storageMetallurgyOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The room temperature (RT) sodium–sulfur batteries (Na–S) hold great promise for practical applications including energy storage and conversion due to high energy density, long lifespan, and low cost, as well based on the abundant reserves of both sodium metal and sulfur. Herein, freestanding (C/S/BaTiO 3 )@TiO 2 (CSB@TiO 2 ) electrode with only ≈3 wt% of BaTiO 3 additive and ≈4 nm thickness of amorphous TiO 2 atomic layer deposition protective layer is rational designed, and first used for RT Na–S batteries. Results show that such cathode material exhibits high rate capability and excellent durability compared with pure C/S and C/S/BaTiO 3 electrodes. Notably, this CSB@TiO 2 electrode performs a discharge capacity of 524.8 and 382 mA h g −1 after 1400 cycles at 1 A g −1 and 3000 cycles at 2 A g −1 , respectively. Such superior electrochemical performance is mainly attributed from the “BaTiO 3 ‐C‐TiO 2 ” synergetic structure within the matrix, which enables effectively inhibiting the shuttle effect, restraining the volumetric variation and stabilizing the ionic transport interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations211
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207