MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AN OBSTACLE DETECTION SYSTEM BASED ON MONOCULAR VISION FOR APPLE ORCHARD ROBOT

2017· article· en· W2783626083 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jianfeng Zhang, Bin Yang, Nan Geng, Lvwen Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstacleComputer visionOrchardMonocular visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMonocularRobotHorticultureGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obstacle detection is one of the key problems in the autonomous movement of intelligent mobile robot.This paper focuses on the study of obstacle detection in the complex apple orchard.First, using L * a * b * (colour space for non-self-illuminated, named by CIE 1976 L * a * b * or CIELAB) colour model to represent the apple orchard image, the obstacles in the robot's walking area can be effectively segmented from the complex background by onedimensional fuzzy entropy image segmentation algorithm.Then, the coordinate of the point close to the robot of the obstacle is obtained.Finally, the distance between the robot and the obstacle is estimated using the inverse perspective transformation.The experimental results show that the maximum absolute error is 7.87 cm and the maximum relative error is 6.53%.The results can meet the accuracy requirements of the intelligent mobile application for an apple orchard robot.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robotics and AutomationSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207