MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783635973 · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2017.8258201

Online machine learning for cloud resource provisioning of microservice backend systems

2017· article· en· W2783635973 on OpenAlex
Hanieh Alipour, Yan Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroservicesWorkloadComputer scienceProvisioningCloud computingBenchmark (surveying)Distributed computingArchitectureResource (disambiguation)Service (business)Resource allocationOperating systemComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microservices are bundled and generating traffic on the backend systems that need to scale on demand. When microservices generate variant and unexpected, the challenge is to classify the workload on the backend systems and adjust the scaling policy to reflect the resource demand timely and accurately. In this paper, we propose a microservice architecture that encapsulates functions of monitoring metrics and learning workload pattern. Then this service architecture is used to predict the future workload for decision making on resource provisioning. We deploy two machine learning algorithms and predict the resource demand of the backend systems of microservices emulated by a Netflix workload benchmark application. This service architecture presents an integrated solution of implementing self-managing cloud data services under variant workload.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207