MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783674317 · doi:10.1002/9781119374633.ch6

Molecular Identification and Distribution of Yeasts in Fruits

2018· other· en· W2783674317 on OpenAlexafffund
Justine Ting, Rui Xu, Jianping Xu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsYeastBiologyIdentification (biology)Human healthBiotechnologyFood scienceBotanyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yeasts are common microbes in both natural and artificial environments. They play significant roles in the food industry, environment, and human health. Due to easy access for microbes to the simple sugars in fruits, including yeasts, fruits could be a significant source of yeasts that could impact both the quality of food as well as human health. In this chapter, we review our current understanding of yeasts in both fresh and processed fruits. We concentrate our efforts on studies that have used molecular methods for yeast species and genotype identifications. While a variety of methods have been used, sequencing of the ITS region has become the standard for yeast species identification and new species discovery. A wide variety of yeast species have been found in fruits and many factors such as fruit type, fruit variety, fruit maturation time, the degree of fruit processing, and the location and climate of fruit growth and processing have been shown to influence yeast species composition associated with fruits. However, many fruits still remain to be investigated for their yeast communities and the mechanisms that govern yeast species and genotype distribution in fruits are largely unknown at present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207