MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783740633 · doi:10.1353/crc.2017.0068

Alice Munro: Reminiscence, Interpretation, Adaptation, and Comparison ed. by Mirosława Buchholtz and Eugenia Sojka

2017· article· en· W2783740633 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Grzegorz Koneczniak

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlice (programming language)BiographyArt historyInterpretation (philosophy)ArtReminiscenceNarrativeHistoryLiteraturePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Alice Munro: Reminiscence, Interpretation, Adaptation, and Comparison ed. by Mirosława Buchholtz and Eugenia Sojka Grzegorz Koneczniak Buchholtz, Mirosława, and Eugenia Sojka , eds. Alice Munro: Reminiscence, Interpretation, Adaptation, and Comparison. Bern: Peter Lang, 2015. Pp. 226. Most book-form criticism on Alice Munro, notwithstanding her ultimate literary success in 2013 with a Nobel Prize in Literature, comes from the period between as early as the 1980s and as recent as 2015. Select publications include, for example, Probable Fictions: Alice Munro's Narrative Acts (1983) by Louis King MacKendrick, Alice Munro: Paradox and Parallel (1987) by Walter Rintoul Martin, Alice Munro (1988) by E.D. Blodgett, Dance of the Sexes: Art and Gender in the Fiction of Alice Munro (1990) by Beverly Jean Rasporich, Mothers and Other Clowns: The Stories of Alice Munro (1992) by Magdalene Redekop, The Tumble of Reason: Alice Munro's Discourse of Absence (1994) by Ajay Heble, Alice Munro: A Double Life (1995) by Catherine Sheldrick Ross, Alice Munro (1998) by Coral Ann Howells, Alice Munro: Writing Her Lives: A Biography (2005, 2011) by Robert Thacker, The Fiction of Alice Munro: [End Page 821] An Appreciation (2008) by Brad Hooper, Alice Munro (2009) by Harold Bloom, and Alice Munro's Narrative Art (2011) by Isla Duncan. The list is not exhaustive; yet, it is sufficient to prove long-standing scholarly interest in Munro's life and the issues addressed in her fiction. Of particular interest is the emphasis on the biographical aspect, bearing in mind that she is a secretive, self-effacing author, despite numerous autobiographical allusions in her work. Alice Munro: Reminiscence, Interpretation, Adaptation and Comparison, a volume edited by Mirosława Buchholtz (Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland) and Eugenia Sojka (University of Silesia, Poland) has been an important contribution to book-form criticism of Munro since the writer received the Nobel Prize in 2013. The editors are experts on Canadian literature whose contributions to the development and promotion of Canadian studies reach far beyond the Polish borders and are international in scope. Both also share significant experience in directing Canadian research centres in Poland: Professor Mirosława Buchholtz was the director of the Canadian Resource Centre in Toruń and dr hab. Eugenia Sojka has been a long-time director of the Canadian Studies Centre in Sosnowiec. Their recent co-edited contribution on Munro includes personal recollections shared by those who have met the Canadian writer (the first part, "Reminiscence"), insightful hermeneutical analyses of Munro's short prose (the second part, "Interpretation"), critical and cross-sectional discussion of Munro's work adapted for various media (the third part, "Adaptation"), and thought-provoking juxtapositions of Munro's literary activity with the oeuvre and heritage of other writers and artists (the fourth part, "Comparison"). The opening article, "Intertextual Encounters with Alice Munro: Introduction," by Eugenia Sojka and Mirosława Buchholtz" (7-14), sets the goal of examining "a critical international and intercultural standpoint on Munro's art of short story writing that is not limited to a literary interpretation of the genre, but also gives critical perspectives on film and stage adaptations of her work" (8). The editors certainly deliver on this promise because the scope of the volume indeed extends beyond the limits of literary studies and the examination of the short story form in Parts II and III. The collection also includes "comparative analyses with Mavis Gallant's and Eudora Welty's writing by academics from Poland, Canada and France" with a contribution from George Elliott Clarke, informed by a postcolonial perspective; additionally, the volume features "exclusive reminiscences of encounters with the author by such Canadian writers as Tomson Highway and Daphne Marlatt" (8). These aspects of the collection are covered in Parts IV and I, respectively. The specific goals, as set by the editors, determine the order in which the essays will be reviewed here: starting with Parts II and III, then moving into Part IV, and finally to Part I. The first article in Part II is Lola Lemire Tostevin's "A Touch of Evil in Carstairs" (35-41). Tostevin argues that Munro's stories are about "secrets, fantasies and, ultimately, the confinement of violence found at the heart of the human...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian review of comparative literatureSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207