Les partenariats entre secteur public et fondations philanthropiques au Québec : genèse, contestation et épilogue d’une réforme de l’action publique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Depuis une dizaine d’années, un acteur joue un rôle pivot dans les relations entre l’État et le milieu associatif, au Québec: les fondations philanthropiques. Au coeur de ces nouveaux liens, se trouvent des partenariats formels, comme ceux créés dans le domaine de l’action sociale entre le gouvernement québécois et la Fondation Lucie et André Chagnon. Ces ententes ont réactivé certaines tensions liées à la revendication d’autonomie des associations. Mais à l’heure de l’austérité budgétaire, des fondations soulignent aussi le risque d’un recul de l’État social. L’article met ainsi en lumière les relations fluctuantes et les débats sur le rôle respectif de l’État, des fondations philanthropiques et des associations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".