MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783775739 · doi:10.1016/j.media.2018.09.002

Joint registration and synthesis using a probabilistic model for alignment of MRI and histological sections

2018· article· en· W2783775739 on OpenAlex
Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Marc Modat, Loïc Peter, Allison Stevens, Roberto Annunziata, Tom Vercauteren, Ed S. Lein, Bruce Fischl, Sébastien Ourselin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Image Analysis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of California, San DiegoNational Institutes of HealthGenentechNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeIXICOServierEisaiDoD Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativePfizerBiogenBioClinicaNational Institute of Mental HealthNeurosciences Research FoundationNational Center for Research ResourcesF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaWellcome TrustNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesSynarcMedpaceEuropean Research CouncilNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationMassachusetts General HospitalU.S. Department of DefenseEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceImage registrationComputer scienceProbabilistic logicComputer visionRigid transformationRobustness (evolution)Mutual informationPattern recognition (psychology)Metric (unit)InferenceAffine transformationBayesian inferenceReal-time MRIBayesian probabilityImage (mathematics)Magnetic resonance imagingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear registration of 2D histological sections with corresponding slices of MRI data is a critical step of 3D histology reconstruction algorithms. This registration is difficult due to the large differences in image contrast and resolution, as well as the complex nonrigid deformations and artefacts produced when sectioning the sample and mounting it on the glass slide. It has been shown in brain MRI registration that better spatial alignment across modalities can be obtained by synthesising one modality from the other and then using intra-modality registration metrics, rather than by using information theory based metrics to solve the problem directly. However, such an approach typically requires a database of aligned images from the two modalities, which is very difficult to obtain for histology and MRI. Here, we overcome this limitation with a probabilistic method that simultaneously solves for deformable registration and synthesis directly on the target images, without requiring any training data. The method is based on a probabilistic model in which the MRI slice is assumed to be a contrast-warped, spatially deformed version of the histological section. We use approximate Bayesian inference to iteratively refine the probabilistic estimate of the synthesis and the registration, while accounting for each other's uncertainty. Moreover, manually placed landmarks can be seamlessly integrated in the framework for increased performance and robustness. Experiments on a synthetic dataset of MRI slices show that, compared with mutual information based registration, the proposed method makes it possible to use a much more flexible deformation model in the registration to improve its accuracy, without compromising robustness. Moreover, our framework also exploits information in manually placed landmarks more efficiently than mutual information: landmarks constrain the deformation field in both methods, but in our algorithm, it also has a positive effect on the synthesis - which further improves the registration. We also show results on two real, publicly available datasets: the Allen and BigBrain atlases. In both of them, the proposed method provides a clear improvement over mutual information based registration, both qualitatively (visual inspection) and quantitatively (registration error measured with pairs of manually annotated landmarks).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it