Interpréter un contrat sans rechercher l’intention commune des parties ? Illustration à l’aide de l’assurance automobile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contrairement à ce qui se produit dans la théorie classique, la recherche de l’intention commune des contractants ne guide pas le processus d’interprétation de la Convention d’indemnisation directe pour le règlement des sinistres automobiles ainsi que la police d’assurance automobile standard. Créatures particulières, ces actes juridiques sont plutôt interprétés à la lumière de la loi, de la jurisprudence et de la règle contra proferentem , ce qui laisse ainsi entrevoir que la détermination de l’intention commune est davantage une question de droit qu’une question de fait. L’étude de l’interprétation de ces deux actes juridiques pourrait bien jeter les bases d’une théorie interprétative du contrat non mutuel (réglementé, standardisé, légal ou imposé).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".