MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783814133 · doi:10.30699/mmlj17.1.2.68

Detection and Distribution of various HLAR Gene in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium by Multiplex-PCR

2018· article· en· W2783814133 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bahar Ramin, Leyla Asadpour, H Forouhesh Tehrani, Nour Amirmozafari

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Medical Laboratory Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobiologyEnterococcus faecalisBiologyMultiplex polymerase chain reactionEnterococcusGeneAntibioticsPolymerase chain reactionGeneticsEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enterococcus spp.Antimicrobial Drug Resistance Multiplex-PCR Background and Objectives: In recent years, three new aminoglycoside resistance genes such as aph (3ʹ)-IIIa and ant (4ʹ)-Ia, that encode for the APH (3ʹ) and ANT (4ʹ) have also been identified.The aim of this study was to come up with a multiplex-PCR procedure for detection of aac(6ʹ)-Ie-aph(2ʹʹ)-Ia, aph(3ʹ)-IIIa, ant(4ʹ)-Ia genes in the Enterococcus spp.clinical isolates.Material and Method: 100 samples were isolated from various specimens, from various hospitals in Tehran, Iran.The grown colonies were identified by standard biochemical and disc diffusion tests.Multiplex-PCR for aac (6')-Ie -aph(2'')-Ia , aph(3ʹ)-IIIa, ant(4ʹ)-Ia genes amplification were performed in order to confirm bacterial colonies as Enterococcus spp.Results: Eighty four (84%) Enterococcus spp.isolates were collected from the 100 specimens.The highest and lowest isolates were related to urine (48%) and sputum (2%).Antibiotic susceptibility test results showed that the highest and lowest resistance was related to tetracycline and nitrofurantoin, respectively.Multiplex PCR results revealed that aac (6ʹ)-Ie-aph (2ʹʹ)-Ia, ant (4ʹ)-Ia and aph (3ʹ)-IIIa genes were present in 6% of the isolated bacteria from the urine, 2% from the wound and 1% from the pleural samples.the aac (6ʹ)-Ie-aph (2ʹʹ)-Ia and aph (3ʹ)-IIIa genes were present in 25% of the isolated strains from the urine, 3% from the wound and 2% from the plural specimens.Nine percent of the strains were isolated from the urine, 3% from the wound and 1% from the plural were positive for aac (6ʹ)-Ie-aph (2ʹʹ)-Ia and ant (4ʹ)-Ia genes.Discussion: we had observed enterococci isolates with phenotypic resistance to HLAR and demonstrated aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2′′)-Ia and aph(3′)-IIIa genes more frequently occurring than other genes.A collection of AMEs are accountable for HLAR status among Enterococcus species.The aac (6ʹ)-Ie-aph (2ʹʹ)-Ia gene was detected more frequently than the other genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Medical Laboratory JournalSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207