Inoculation with microbial consortia enhances the growth, nutrition and oil concentration of Ocimum sanctum
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ocimum sanctum is an important medicinal plant. The leaves are rich in eugenol, which is the active constituent of this medicinal plant. An earlier pot culture study brought out that Pantoea dispersa as the best PGPR and Glomus monosporum as the best AM fungi for inoculating Ocimum sanctum. In the present investigation, a pot culture experiment was conducted in a glasshouse, to study the effect of individual as well as microbial consortia of P. dispersa + G. monosporum on the growth of O. sanctum. The plant height, stem girth, plant dry matter and essential oil concentration and its main component eugenol were significantly higher in plants inoculated with P. dispersa + G. monosporum. The results showed that inoculation with microbial consortia, significantly increased root and shoot biomass of O. sanctum as well as eugenol, in comparison to control. It was concluded that the inoculated microbial consortia (P. dispersa + G. monosporum) interact synergistically and increased the biomaas and yield of oil in O. sanctum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it