Inoculation with microbial consortia enhances the growth, nutrition and oil concentration of Ocimum sanctum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ocimum sanctum is an important medicinal plant. The leaves are rich in eugenol, which is the active constituent of this medicinal plant. An earlier pot culture study brought out that Pantoea dispersa as the best PGPR and Glomus monosporum as the best AM fungi for inoculating Ocimum sanctum. In the present investigation, a pot culture experiment was conducted in a glasshouse, to study the effect of individual as well as microbial consortia of P. dispersa + G. monosporum on the growth of O. sanctum. The plant height, stem girth, plant dry matter and essential oil concentration and its main component eugenol were significantly higher in plants inoculated with P. dispersa + G. monosporum. The results showed that inoculation with microbial consortia, significantly increased root and shoot biomass of O. sanctum as well as eugenol, in comparison to control. It was concluded that the inoculated microbial consortia (P. dispersa + G. monosporum) interact synergistically and increased the biomaas and yield of oil in O. sanctum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".