Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une fonction du systeme de sante est d’assurer les ressources necessaires a son fonctionnement present et futur. La profession medicale y constitue une composante essentielle dont la creation et planification influencera la performance du systeme et par consequent la sante des populations. La politique des ressources humaines depend du contexte local; les comparaisons internationales permettent de comprendre ce qu’a ete mis en place dans d'autres pays. Apres une partie consacree aux concepts de politique publique dans ce domaine, l’ouvrage analyse la regulation de la profession medicale dans quatre pays de l’OCDE (Australie, Canada, France, Royaume-Uni). L’efficience de la profession medicale devrait etre consideree dans sa globalite, elle a ete separee ici en macro-efficience ou densite medicale optimale et en micro-efficience ou meilleure performance des professionnels de sante, dependant de leviers d’action organisationnels ou des incitations comme les methodes de remuneration. Ce livre s’adresse aux professionnels de sante, et surtout aux specialistes de sante publique et travaillant dans le domaine des ressources humaines dans les systemes de sante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".