MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784017108 · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13091

Geostatistical models using remotely‐sensed data predict savanna tsetse decline across the interface between protected and unprotected areas in Serengeti, Tanzania

2018· article· en· W2784017108 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jennifer Lord, Stephen J. Torr, Harriet Auty, Mechtilda Byamungu, John W. Hargrove, Liam J. Morrison, Furaha Mramba, G. A. Vale, Michelle C. Stanton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Ecology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrypanosoma species research and implications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTanzania Wildlife Research InstituteBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilInternational Development Research CentreDirectorate for Biological SciencesDepartment for International Development, UK GovernmentEuropean CommissionDepartment for International DevelopmentNatural Environment Research CouncilSeventh Framework ProgrammeTanzania Commission for Science and TechnologyUNICEF
KeywordsTransectAbundance (ecology)TanzaniaWoodlandGeographyGrasslandNational parkSampling (signal processing)Aerial surveyEcologyEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographyCartographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Monitoring abundance is essential for vector management, but it is often only possible in a fraction of managed areas. For vector control programmes, sampling to estimate abundance is usually carried out at a local‐scale (10s km 2 ), while interventions often extend across 100s km 2 . Geostatistical models have been used to interpolate between points where data are available, but this still requires costly sampling across the entire area of interest. Instead, we used geostatistical models to predict local‐scale spatial variation in the abundance of tsetse—vectors of human and animal African trypanosomes—beyond the spatial extent of data to which models were fitted, in Serengeti, Tanzania. We sampled Glossina swynnertoni and Glossina pallidipes >10 km inside the Serengeti National Park (SNP) and along four transects extending into areas where humans and livestock live. We fitted geostatistical models to data >10 km inside the SNP to produce maps of abundance for the entire region, including unprotected areas. Inside the SNP, the mean number of G. pallidipes caught per trap per day in dense woodland was 166 (± 24 SE ), compared to 3 (±1) in grassland. Glossina swynnertoni was more homogenous with respective means of 15 (±3) and 15 (±8). In general, models predicted a decline in abundance from protected to unprotected areas, related to anthropogenic changes to vegetation, which was confirmed during field survey. Synthesis and applications . Our approach allows vector control managers to identify sites predicted to have relatively high tsetse abundance, and therefore to design and implement improved surveillance strategies. In East and Southern Africa, trypanosomiasis is associated with wilderness areas. Our study identified pockets of vegetation which could sustain tsetse populations in farming areas outside the Serengeti National Park. Our method will assist countries in identifying, monitoring and, if necessary, controlling tsetse in trypanosomiasis foci. This has specific application to tsetse, but the approach could also be developed for vectors of other pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied EcologySame topicTrypanosoma species research and implicationsFrench-language works237,207