MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784027381

Descriptive Catalogue of Rare Books in the Library of Notre Dame College, Wilcox, Saskatchewan

2003· dissertation· en· W2784027381 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael D. Santer

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceArtHistoryComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this thesis was to provide a catalogue of Athol Murray's rare book collection which is located at Notre Dame College in Wilcox. Identification of the books was completed using a variety of sources: internet library catalogues, published catalogues, and several dictionaries. The manuscripts listed in the appendix were identified in a collaboration effort by Professor Peter Bietenholz and colleagues. The second objective was to label the books with an accession number for the use of the museum in Wilcox. An electronic database was also turned over to them for local use. The third objective was an analysis of the books to determine the source or sources from which Athol Murray received the books. The results of the analysis show that there are several sources to the collection and that some of the sources cannot be determined. The diversity of the books in this collection reflects the eclectic interests of the man who collected them. The condition in which the books are found now may be a result of Athol Murray's teaching style. However, there is no written evidence to corroborate the condition of the books before he received them. Notre Dame College has gone to great lengths to maintain the books in their current condition. It is the hope of this author that this catalogue of the collection will bring greater awareness of these treasures to the academic community and the public in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Dataset
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes
Not applicablemedium
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.791

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.032
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther · Dataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207