MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784102781 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10810

Crystal Structures and Electronic Properties of Xe–Cl Compounds at High Pressure

2018· article· en· W2784102781 on OpenAlexaff
Niloofar Zarifi, Hanyu Liu, John S. Tse, Eva Zurek

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersBasic Energy SciencesDivision of Materials Research
KeywordsMetastabilityXenonZigzagCrystal structureCrystallographyMaterials scienceChlorine atomChlorineDensity functional theoryPhase (matter)Crystal (programming language)MonomerPhysical chemistryChemistryComputational chemistryPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crystal structure prediction techniques coupled with enthalpies obtained at 0 K from density functional theory calculations suggest that pressure can be used to stabilize the chlorides of xenon. In particular, XeCl and XeCl 2 were calculated to become metastable by 10 GPa and thermodynamically stable with respect to the elemental phases by 60 GPa. Whereas at low pressures Cl 2 dimers were found in the stable phases, zigzag Cl chains were present in Cmcm XeCl at 60 GPa and atomistic chlorine comprised P 6 3 / mmc XeCl and Fd 3̅ m XeCl 2 at 100 GPa. A XeCl 4 phase that was metastable at 100 GPa contained monomers, dimers, and trimers of chlorine. XeCl, XeCl 2, and XeCl 4 were metallic at 100 GPa, and at this pressure they were predicted to be superconducting below 9.0, 4.3, and 0.3 K, respectively. Spectroscopic properties of the predicted phases are presented to aid in their eventual characterization, should they ever be synthesized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207