MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784122927 · doi:10.1109/icmla.2017.0-177

A Hybrid Scheme for Fault Diagnosis with Partially Labeled Sets of Observations

2017· article· en· W2784122927 on OpenAlexaff
Roozbeh Razavi‐Far, Ehsan Hallaji, Mehrdad Saif, Luis Rueda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimensionality reductionComputer scienceCurse of dimensionalityArtificial intelligenceScheme (mathematics)Machine learningReduction (mathematics)Fault (geology)Supervised learningProcess (computing)Pattern recognition (psychology)Classification schemeData miningArtificial neural networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine learning techniques are widely used for diagnosing faults to guarantee the safe and reliable operation of the systems. Among various techniques, semi-supervised learning can help in diagnosing faulty states and decision making in partially labeled data, where only a few number of labeled observations along with a large number of unlabeled observations are collected from the process. Thus, it is crucial to conduct a critical study on the use of semi-supervised techniques for both dimensionality reduction and fault classification. In this work, three state-of-the- art semi-supervised dimensionality reduction techniques are used to produce informative features for semi-supervised fault classifiers. This study aims to achieve the best pair of the semisupervised dimensionality reduction and classification techniques that can be integrated into the diagnostic scheme for decision making under partially labeled sets of observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207