MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784170962

Im Bann der Austeritätspolitik: Prognose der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung 2012

2011· article· de· W2784170962 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gustav A. Horn, Alexander Herzog‐Stein, Peter Hohlfeld, Fabian Lindner, Katja Rietzler, Sabine Stephan, Silke Tober, Achim Truger, Rudolf Zwiener

Bibliographic record

VenueEconstor (Econstor) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGerman Economic Analysis & Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAusterityUnemploymentEconomicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Real gross domestic productGermanGDP deflatorGerman economyConsumer confidence indexEconomyPolitical scienceKeynesian economicsGeographyEconomic growthMonetary economics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Die deutsche Konjunktur hat sich nach einem dynamischen Auftakt zu Jahresbeginn 2011 im weiteren Jahresverlauf merklich abgekühlt. Im Jahresdurchschnitt stieg das Bruttoinlandsprodukt um 3,0 %, im Jahresverlauf nur um 2,2 %. Die Aussichten für das Jahr 2012 stimmen nicht optimistisch. Eine Abschwächung der Weltkonjunktur, die Vertrauenskrise im Euroraum und der harte Sparkurs in vielen EU-Ländern führen im kommenden Jahr dazu, dass da Wachstumstempo der deutschen Wirtschaft zum Erliegen kommt. Im Jahr 2012 wird der Rückgang des Bruttoinlandsprodukts im Jahresdurchschnitt voraussichtlich 0,1 % betragen, im Verlauf sogar 0,4 %. Die Arbeitslosigkeit wird erst im Verlauf des nächsten Jahres zunehmen. Die Arbeitslosenquote bleibt im Jahresdurchschnitt mit 6,9 % aber noch niedrig. Der Anstieg der Verbraucherpreise wird im kommenden Jahr 1,6 % betragen, nach 2,3 % in diesem Jahr.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconstor (Econstor)Same topicGerman Economic Analysis & PoliciesFrench-language works237,207