MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784233473 · doi:10.1002/mren.201700061

Tuning Bis(imino)pyridyl Iron‐Catalyzed Ethylene Oligomerization by Modification of MAO with <i>p</i>‐BrPhOH

2018· article· en· W2784233473 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Zhang, Jian Ye, Binbo Jiang, Jingdai Wang, Zuwei Liao, Zhengliang Huang, Yongrong Yang, Zhibin Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEthyleneCatalysisChemistryPolymerElectron paramagnetic resonanceFerricPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To reduce the simultaneous production of insoluble polymers during the bis(imino)pyridyl iron‐catalyzed ethylene oligomerization, in this study, p ‐BrPhOH (4‐bromophenol) has been chosen as the most optimal modifier for the production of linear α‐olefins. It is found that the polymer share in the total products is largely reduced with the use of p ‐BrPhOH as the modifier. The catalytic system also possesses a high activity with the liquid production maintained high level of linearity. Moreover, the introduction of p ‐BrPhOH promoted the high‐temperature stability of the catalytic system, leading to the enhanced oligomerization activity as the catalytic system can catalyze ethylene oligomerization at higher temperatures. A characterization of the catalytic system with electron paramagnetic resonance shows that introduction of p ‐BrPhOH significantly inhibits the formation of ferric ions, which can be the main active centers responsible for generating undesired insoluble polymers, thus this can largely retard the production of insoluble polymers during ethylene oligomerization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Reaction EngineeringSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207