MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784271635 · doi:10.1002/pd.5211

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: All prenatally detected lower urinary tract obstructions should be shunted

2018· editorial· en· W2784271635 on OpenAlexaff
Roland Devlieger, R. Douglas Wilson, Rodrigo Ruano

Bibliographic record

VenuePrenatal Diagnosis · 2018
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrenatal diagnosisMedicineUrinary systemFetusPediatricsIntensive care medicineObstetricsPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What's already known about this topic? LUTO is a rare but life‐threatening condition affecting the fetus and child in which prenatal therapy is currently being offered but remains controversial. A recent RCT comparing this treatment to post‐natal treatment in selected cases failed to come to robust conclusions due to under‐recruitment. So, the controversy persists. What does this study add? In this debate, 2 renown experts in the field develop their arguments pro and against shunting for all LUTO cases based on the current literature and a long‐standing clinical experience in the field of fetal therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrenatal DiagnosisSame topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesFrench-language works237,207