MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784281820 · doi:10.1109/wsc.2017.8248187

Simulation based process mapping for the fabrication of bridge girders

2017· article· en· W2784281820 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Mohsenijam, Meimanat Soleimanifar, Ming Lu

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrefabricationBridge (graph theory)FabricationGirderScheduling (production processes)EngineeringProcess (computing)Construction engineeringComputer scienceManufacturing engineeringCivil engineeringOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern construction projects have been shifting to offsite prefabrication with hopes of enhancing performance and improving productivity. Off-site construction of structures such as heavy structural steel bridges involves the fabrication of a significant portion of the required construction components including bridge girders and assemblies in off-site fabrication facilities in a more controlled environment before delivering finished components to the construction site for erection. Unlike manufacturing, steel fabrication is labor intensive and less automated while undergoes frequent change orders and shop layout changes. These features make tracking the daily utilization of the workforce and thus labor cost and productivity difficult. To address this issue, a simplified discrete simulation approach (SDESA) is implemented to build an integrated data-driven system as an effective tool for modeling the operational details involved in the fabrication of bridge girders which supports estimating, scheduling and analyzing production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2017 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)Same topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207