MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784460844 · doi:10.31468/cjsdwr.537

Between "worlds apart": Situating student work between the academic classroom and workplace

2005· article· en· W2784460844 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Maria Wilson, Clara John

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscourse and Writing/Rédactologie · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCommunication in Education and Healthcare
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)SociologyPedagogyStudent engagementMathematics educationPsychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article fait etat d'un projet longitudinal qui tente de situer I' ecriture scolaire dans l'espace separant le monde universitaire de celui du travail.Ce projet a ete realise par plusieurs groupes d' etudiants d' annees differentes suivant le meme cours.Les auteurs estiment que I' engagement fait par l'etu-Recent research into academic and workplace acting and writing (e.g., Dias, Freedman, Medway & Pare, i999; Dias & Pare, 2000) convincingly demonstrates that there are profound differences between writing that occurs in the academic classroom and Technostyle Vol.21, No. 1 2005 Fall

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.010
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscourse and Writing/RédactologieSame topicCommunication in Education and HealthcareFrench-language works237,207