MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784562176 · doi:10.4000/osp.5527

La démocratisation des études supérieures à l’aune de la différenciation et de l’individualisation des parcours scolaires au Québec

2017· article· fr· W2784562176 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pierre Canisius Kamanzi, Annie Pilote, Morgane Uzenat, Sandrine Gris

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité LavalCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine dans quelle mesure les politiques d’assouplissement, de décloisonnement et d’individualisation des parcours scolaires au Québec favorisent la démocratisation de l’enseignement supérieur. Une analyse des données longitudinales tirées du fichier administratif du ministère de l’Éducation montre que l’institutionnalisation des parcours non linéaires contribue de façon significative à accroître la proportion des jeunes issus de milieux défavorisés accédant aux études supérieures et y obtenant un diplôme. Cette contribution demeure toutefois relativement limitée, car ces parcours sont davantage empruntés par leurs pairs issus des milieux de classes moyennes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL’Orientation scolaire et professionnelleSame topicHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207