MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784683099 · doi:10.1088/1361-651x/aaaf94

A unified framework for heat and mass transport at the atomic scale

2018· article· en· W2784683099 on OpenAlexafffund
Mauricio Ponga, Dingyi Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueModelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMass transportStatistical physicsMaterials scienceExploitDomain (mathematical analysis)Transient (computer programming)Mean free pathScale (ratio)ThermalSteady state (chemistry)Transport theoryPath (computing)Nanoscopic scaleMechanicsComputer sciencePhysicsNanotechnologyThermodynamicsEngineering physicsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a unified framework to simulate heat and mass transport in systems of particles. The proposed framework is based on kinematic mean field theory and uses a phenomenological master equation to compute effective transport rates between particles without the need to evaluate operators. We exploit this advantage and apply the model to simulate transport phenomena at the nanoscale. We demonstrate that, when calibrated to experimentally-measured transport coefficients, the model can accurately predict transient and steady state temperature and concentration profiles even in scenarios where the length of the device is comparable to the mean free path of the carriers. Through several example applications, we demonstrate the validity of our model for all classes of materials, including ones that, until now, would have been outside the domain of computational feasibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModelling and Simulation in Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207