MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784709978 · doi:10.21037/apm.2018.s014

AB014. The evolution of the Kelley community capacity development model for palliative care

2018· article· en· W2784709978 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mary Lou Kelley

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Palliative Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePalliative careNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This oral presentation will describe the conceptual evolution of the Kelley model for Community Capacity Development [2000-2016]. It will illustrate how and why the model changed to become a powerful Canadian example of a public health approach to developing community based palliative care programs. Based on conducting participatory action research in rural, First Nations communities and long-term care homes, the perspective of "community" gradually expanded beyond health care professionals to include natural helpers, front line care providers, formal and informal community leaders, and social services. The Kelley model has potential to be applied internationally since it builds a context specific palliative care program that is grounded in the local community and uses existing informal and formal resources. The Kelley model is a theory of change and can be used to guide a process of developing community-based palliative care programs. The model includes a series of four incremental but non-linear phases. Development is a bottom-up process that is grounded in the unique needs, vision, culture and values of a specific community. Community change is made from inside the community and not from outside. Development builds on existing resources, relationships, strengths and assets. Based on participatory action research and applying the model in rural communities, First Nations communities and long term care homes, the definition of the "community" in the model gradually expanded from registered health care providers and health services only. Supportive community members, often taken for granted by health care professionals but critical to the success of community palliative care, gradually became more visible through the research. The Kelley model of the palliative care community grew to include natural helpers, front line providers such as personal support workers, formal and informal community leaders, and social services. The Kelley model is a Canadian model that can be used to guide community based palliative care development in many diverse geographic, organizational or cultural communities. It can be applied internationally since it creates a palliative care program that is grounded in a unique local community and uses existing informal and formal resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.020
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.430
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.044 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Palliative MedicineSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207