MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784802831

Meme Kanserinde Ergoterapi Temelli Problem Çözme Stratejisi Eğitiminin Etkinliği

2018· dissertation· tr· W2784802831 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicProblem Solving Skills Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyGynecologyHumanitiesMedicineArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was planned to evaluate activity participation, cancer-related fatigue, depression and quality of life in individuals with breast cancer and to examine the effect of occupational therapy based problem solving strategy training (OTB-PSST) applied to them. Study included randomly chosen 22 individuals with breast cancer who applied to Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital Outpatient Polyclinic. The Socio-demographic and Clinical Features Information Collection Form and Canada Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM) were applied with the semi-structured interview method in the light of Canadian Model of Occupational Performance perspective. Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QOL-C30 -EORTC QOL-BR23) were also applied to them. The Turkish translation, reliability and the validity study of CFS was designed as a preliminary study during the thesis study; it’s test-retest reliability (ICC: 0,95) were high and good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha: 0,74). OTB- PSST intervention was administered for 6 weeks, 1 session per week for an average of 60 minutes each session. At the end of the intervention, the individuals with breast cancer were evaluated again with the same scales and the results were compared. As a result of our study, there was a statistically significant difference between the pre and post treatment measurements in the CFS, BDI and COPM performance and satisfaction scores (p<0,01). When the activity distribution results are analyzed according to the performance areas, it was determined that the individuals with breast cancer had most of their problems in the productivity area (household management) activities. According to the results of individuals’ problem-solving strategy steps, most of the activity performance problems were addressed by developing adaptive strategies such as adding new steps to the activity. When the EORTC QOL-C30 and EORTC QOL-BR23 quality of life test results are examined; the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention results of the functional status and symptom scale subscale scores of the tests were statistically significant (p<0,05). OTB- PSST interventions provide positive benefits for individuals with breast cancer, reducing cancer-related fatigue and depression, improving performance and satisfaction levels of activities, and increasing quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it