Demanda y participación de responsabilidad social corporativa y turismo sostenible – Implicaciones para el Caribe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existe abundante literatura sobre la necesidad de un turismo sostenible, pero existen relativamente pocos autores que hayan examinando su aplicación práctica y sus implicaciones en regiones específicas del mundo. Este estudio tiene como finalidad identificar y evaluar las prácticas de responsabilidad social corporativa en el sector turístico y los códigos de conducta, tanto los publicados por organizaciones internacionales o no gubernamentales, como los incorporados por las propias empresas. El estudio también intenta determinar la demanda de turismo sostenible. Al identificar la situación actual de la sostenibilidad dentro de la industria del turismo, es posible determinar cuáles son las acciones n necesarias para promover el programa, especialmente en regiones tales como el Caribe. La cuestión surge por primera vez como parte de un estudio más extenso, realizado para el Banco Mundial/CorporaciónFinanciera Internacional (Dodds & Joppe, 2005), sin embargo, este estudio tenía mayor alcance con respecto al acceso a los mercados turísticos de los países menos desarrollados.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".