MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784858432

Advancements in Nailed Connections

2001· dissertation· en· W2784858432 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Maura Lecce

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

h v i o u s research on nailed comections has d t e d in the development of design guidelines for shear, bearing and net section fracture faiiure modes, for both static and fatigue loading.Since then new W e s s steeI powder actuated fasteners (or "naiis") have been developed.The purpose of this experimentai study was to determine if the existing design guidelines are vad, or requin modification, for the new stainiess steel na&.A total of 21 nailed comections have ken tested under static I&g and results confirm that current design guidelines are appiicabie for connections made with new-generation stainiess steel mils.Furthexmore, a total of 16 fatipe tests have been conducted and the existing fatigue S-N curves have been modifieci tu accommodate the current experimental data an stainless steel d e d connections.More research is recpked to develop design guidelines which take bending stresses into accuunt.Advanccments in Nailcd Connections Acknowled~emcnts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicEngineering Structural Analysis MethodsFrench-language works237,207