Social Capital and Poverty in Two Rural Community, Sukamakmur Subdistrict, Bogor Regency, West Java
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poverty is one of the social problems that are complex and not easily overcome. Many of the programs organized by the government with the aim of improving social welfare and reduce poverty, both in rural and urban community. Poverty in the rural population is still relatively high, despite the many efforts made by the government and many who hope to reduce poverty. Many factors lead to or affecting rural poverty remains high. There is a new paradigm says that social capital has a relationship with poverty. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the level of poverty of the rural population, analyze the level of social capital, and analyze how the relationship between social capital and poverty level of the community. This research was supported quantitative qualitative data. The results of this study demonstrated an association between social capital with urban poverty. Key words: poverty, relationship, rural community, social capital====================================================ABSTRAK Kemiskinan merupakan salah satu masalah sosial yang sangat kompleks dan tidak mudah penanggulangannya. Banyak program yang diselenggarakan oleh pemerintah dengan tujuan meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat dan mengurangi kemiskinan, baik dalam unit desa maupun kota. Kemiskinan pada masyarakat perdesaan masih tergolong tinggi, walaupun telah banyak upaya yang dilakukan pemerintah dan banyak pihak yang harapannya dapat mengurangi penduduk miskin. Banyak faktor yang mengakibatkan atau mempengaruhi kemiskinan masyarakat perdesaan tetap tinggi. Ada sebuah paradigma baru yang mengatakan bahwa modal sosial memiliki hubungan yang erat dengan kemiskinan. Tujuan dari tulisan ini adalah menganalisis tingkat kemiskinan masyarakat perdesaan, menganalisis tingkat modal sosial, dan menganalisis bagaimana hubungan antara tingkat modal sosial dengan kemiskinan masyarakat tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif yang didukung data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan terdapat hubungan antara modal sosial dengan kemiskinan masyarakat perdesaan.Kata kunci: hubungan, kemiskinan, masyarakat perdesaan, modal sosial
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".