MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mutational dynamics of early and late relapsed childhood ALL: rapid clonal expansion and long-term dormancy

2018· article· en· W2784875453 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean-François Spinella, Chantal Richer, Pauline Cassart, Manon Ouimet, Jasmine Healy, Daniel Sinnett

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Advances · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCompute CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsDormancyBiologyMutationTerm (time)Dynamics (music)Evolutionary dynamicsEvolutionary biologyResistance (ecology)GeneticsMedicineEcologyPsychologyGenePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (cALL) is the most frequent pediatric cancer. Refractory/relapsed cALL presents a survival rate of ∼45% and is still one of the leading causes of death by disease among children. Mechanisms, such as clonal competition and evolutionary adaptation, govern treatment resistance. However, the underlying clonal dynamics leading to multiple relapses and differentiating early (<36 months postdiagnosis) from late relapse events remain elusive. Here, we use an integrative genome-based analysis combined with serial sampling of relapsed tumors (from primary tumor to ≤4 relapse events) from 19 pre-B-cell cALL patients (8 early and 11 late relapses) to assess the fitness of somatic mutations and infer their ancestral relationships. By quantifying both general clonal dynamics and newly acquired subclonal diversity, we show that 2 distinct evolutionary patterns govern early and late relapse: on one hand, a highly dynamic pattern, sustained by a putative defect of DNA repair processes, illustrating the quick emergence of fitter clones, and on the other hand, a quasi-inert evolution pattern, suggesting the escape from dormancy of leukemia stem cells likely spared from initial cytoreductive therapy. These results offer new insights into cALL relapse mechanisms and highlight the pressing need for adapted treatment strategies to circumvent resistance mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood AdvancesSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207