MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784941595 · doi:10.1007/s00343-017-7466-6

Erratum to: Vol. 35 No. 1 Publisher’s Erratum

2017· erratum· en· W2784941595 on OpenAlexaff
Shuangyan He, Mingxia He, Jürgen Fischer, Dongliang Yuan, Peng Xu, Tengfei Xu, Yang Xian-ping, Leonid Sokoletsky, Xiaodao Wei, Fang Shen, Juhong Zou, Maohua Guo, Songxue Cui, Wu Zhou, Dalu Gao, Guangzhen Jin, Xianqing Lü, Fuwen Qiu, Wendong Fang, Aijun Pan, Jing Cha, Shanwu Zhang, Jiang Huang, Tao Wang, Yongzhou Cheng, Zhaopu Liu, Xiaohua Long, Zhi-Shuai Hou, Haishen Wen, Jifang Li, Feng He, Qun Liu, Jinhuan Wang, Qinglong Wang, Md Shahjahan, Md. Farajul Kabir, Kizar Ahmed Sumon, Lipi Rani Bhowmik, Harunur Rashid, Shu Li, Kefu Yu, Jian‐xin Zhao, Yuexing Feng, Tianran Chen, Shun Zhou, Yichao Ren, Christopher M. Pearce, Shuanglin Dong, Xiangli Tian, Qinfeng Gao, Fang Wang, Liming Liu, Rongbin Du, Xiaoling Zhang, Shichun Sun, Song Feng, Jianing Lin, Song Sun, Fang Zhang, Zhipeng Zhang, Xuexi Tang, Haitian Tang, Jingjing Song, Jian Zhou, Hongjun Liu, Qixiang Wang, Kuimei Qian, Xia Liu, Yuwei Chen, Chengjun Sun, Fenghua Jiang, Wei Gao, Xiaoyun Li, Yanzhen Yu, Xiaofei Yin, Yong Wang, Haibing Ding, Zhongmin Sun, Yongqiang Wang, Pengcheng Yan, Hui Guo, Jianting Yao, Jiro Tanaka, Hiroshi Kawai, Na Song, Muyan Chen, Tianxiang Gao, Takashi Yanagimoto, Xia Lu, Sheng Luan, Jie Kong, Longyang Hu, Yong Mao, Shengping Zhong, Yan Liu, Weihong Zhao, Caiyan Li, Hui Miao

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology · 2017
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1460.143

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of Oceanology and LimnologySame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207