Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le terme « modernisme », déjà courant dans l’étude de la littérature, du cinéma, des arts plastiques et de l’architecture, est de plus en plus employé pour désigner une certaine avant-garde musicale. Au Québec, cette tendance s’observe à partir des années 1950, période d’intense expérimentation, de réflexion et de production de la part des créateurs. Ce livre propose un tour d’horizon de la création musicale au Québec depuis cinquante ans avec l’analyse de vingt et une œuvres de seize compositeurs qui défendent, perpétuent ou remettent en question le modernisme. Destiné à des mélomanes avertis ainsi qu’à des interprètes curieux de découvrir un répertoire inouï, ce véritable guide d’écoute est accompagné d’un enregistrement de la plupart des œuvres à l’étude et de leur partition, disponibles sur le site du Centre de musique canadienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".