MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2785128910 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.7478

Famille, femmes et travail

2010· book-chapter· fr· W2785128910 on OpenAlexaff
Francine Michaud

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il y a de cela près de vingt ans, Denise Angers couchait par écrit un bilan historiographique sur les femmes et l’organisation du travail dans les terres d’Empire à la fin du Moyen Âge, notamment à l’examen des travaux savants publiés entre 1980 et 1985. On y apprenait alors qu’en dépit de restrictions universelles qui affectaient les femmes dans les sociétés anciennes, le travail féminin atteignait un certain âge d’or au XVe siècle, grâce à la reprise économique, mais aussi – et peut-être s...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks→Same topicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues→French-language works237,207→