MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785227036 · doi:10.4314/jfas.v10i1.18

A great reliability, causes a decrease of failures in the rotating machines

2018· article· en· W2785227036 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMean time between failuresReliability engineeringSpare partReliability (semiconductor)Weibull distributionEngineeringWork (physics)Failure rateComputer scienceOperations managementMechanical engineeringStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since industrial machines are prone to multiple modes of failures, or the opportunities for breakdowns and incidents are multiple, and given that the operating factors have a random nature, may cause unanticipated cataleptic failures. To reduce overall mai number of unplanned outages, it is necessary to ensure a great reliability, causes a decrease of failures in the rotating machines and to improve the MTBF of the machine. Thus define the maintenance actions to be carried out and the spa selective maintenance. That is why, the aim of this work is to use the law of Waloddi Weibull in order to know at all times the reliability, the MTBF and ensure the availability of equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it