MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785227036 · doi:10.4314/jfas.v10i1.18

A great reliability, causes a decrease of failures in the rotating machines

2018· article· en· W2785227036 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Abdellatif Bensaci, Rachid Chaib

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMean time between failuresReliability engineeringSpare partReliability (semiconductor)Weibull distributionEngineeringWork (physics)Failure rateComputer scienceOperations managementMechanical engineeringStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since industrial machines are prone to multiple modes of failures, or the opportunities for breakdowns and incidents are multiple, and given that the operating factors have a random nature, may cause unanticipated cataleptic failures. To reduce overall mai number of unplanned outages, it is necessary to ensure a great reliability, causes a decrease of failures in the rotating machines and to improve the MTBF of the machine. Thus define the maintenance actions to be carried out and the spa selective maintenance. That is why, the aim of this work is to use the law of Waloddi Weibull in order to know at all times the reliability, the MTBF and ensure the availability of equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fundamental and Applied SciencesSame topicEngineering Diagnostics and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207