MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785327253 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-01/30/1771

Novel Methodology for Ex-Situ Characterization of Catalysts in Reversal Tolerant PEM-FCs

2018· article· en· W2785327253 on OpenAlexaff
Colin E. Moore, Jennie I. Eastcott, Max Cimenti, Natalia Kremliakova, Előd Gyenge

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsAutomotive Fuel Cell Cooperation (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteAnodeProton exchange membrane fuel cellCatalysisCyclic voltammetryDissolutionElectrochemistryLinear sweep voltammetryChemical engineeringMaterials scienceCathodeChemistryOxygen evolutionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrodeChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To reduce damage to carbon containing components of fuel cell stacks during start-up and shutdown, extensive research has been carried out to produce reversal tolerant anodes (RTAs) using oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts [1-4]. However, most of these results were obtained using resource intensive in-situ testing that suffers from long experimental times. To address this, a series of ex-situ experiments was devised to characterize the activity and durability of OER catalysts in a simulated polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEMFC) environment. The dissolution/re-deposition mechanism of the OER catalysts were investigated using a combination of linear sweep voltammetry and potential stepping experiments within the normal operating range of PEMFCs (0 V to 1.2 V vs RHE). During normal fuel cell operation, IrO2 based catalysts form soluble Ir3+ species as an intermediate between metallic Ir and IrO2. Ir3+ ions can be washed out of the cell which diminishes the reversal tolerance of the anode. After our electrochemical testing, dissolved Ir3+ concentrations in the electrolyte were determined using the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method. An in-line ICP-MS technique was previously used by Cherevko et al. to determine the potential resolved dissolution in real time [5]. To validate the ex-situ accelerated testing protocol, experimental reversal tolerance tests were carried out at four different temperatures (20, 40, 60 and 80 °C) and the results showed an increase in the concentration of Ir detected in the electrolyte solutions (Fig. 1). Additionally, different OER catalysts were tested and the results were correlated with in-situ reversal tolerance tests. The effect of OER catalyst structure and support interactions on catalyst stability was investigated by a combination of surface analytical and electrochemical techniques. The surface analysis revealed that there was dissolution and re-deposition occurring during accelerated degradation testing. SEM-EDX imaging of the catalyst layer after testing, showed relocation of the OER catalyst to the cracks of the gas diffusion layer supporting a microporous layer (GDL/MPL) substrate (Fig. 1). Taniguchi A, Akita T, Yasuda K, Miyazaki Y (2004) Analysis of electrocatalyst degradation in PEMFC caused by cell reversal during fuel starvation. J Power Sources 130:42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.035 Ralph TR, Hudson S, Wilkinson DP (2006) Electrocatalyst stability in PEMFCs and the role of fuel starvation and cell reversal tolerant anodes. ECS Trans 1:67–84. doi: 10.1149/1.2214545 Mandal P, Litster S (2016) Investigation and mitigation of degradation in polymer electrolyte fuel cell due to cell reversal using oxygen evolution catalyst. Meet Abstr MA2016-01:1419–1419. Jung J, Park B, Kim J (2012) Durability test with fuel starvation using a Pt/CNF catalyst in PEMFC. Nanoscale Res Lett 7:34. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-34 Cherevko S, Geiger S, Kasian O, Kulyk N, Grote J-P, Savan A, Shrestha BR, Merzlikin S, Breitbach B, Ludwig A, Mayrhofer KJJ (2016) Oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions on Ru, RuO2, Ir, and IrO2 thin film electrodes in acidic and alkaline electrolytes: A comparative study on activity and stability. Catalysis Today 262:170–180. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.08.014 Figure 1. Images: backscattered electron (BSE) detector images at 500x magnification of OER catalysts deposited on a GDL/MPL (a) before ex-situ testing and (b) after ex-situ testing. The bright dots were confirmed by EDX to contain Ir atoms. Bar graph: Electrolyte Ir concentration after accelerated degradation protocol. Performed in a flooded, N2 purged, 0.09 M H2SO4, three electrode cell for 30,000 cycles from 0.05 V to 1.2 V vs. RHE with a 1 s hold at each potential. OER catalysts were prepared by sonication in 2-propanol overnight and then 400 μg deposited dropwise onto the GDL/MPL substrate. Three trials were carried at each temperature and the error bars are the standard error of the trials. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207