MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785363140 · doi:10.15406/ijawb.2017.02.00038

Strategic Development Planning for Agricultural Development and the Integration of other Domains Important for the Territory

2017· article· en· W2785363140 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureDevelopment (topology)BusinessAgricultural developmentEnvironmental planningProcess managementEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEnvironmental scienceArchaeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In strategic development plans for agriculture, it is important to recognize that in a given territory it may also be necessary based on the preoccupations of the multiple actors involved, including citizens, to integrate other strategic orientations in order to achieve the vision constructed for the territory. Thus, this could include the domain of water quality conservation, the conservation of flora and fauna including the conservation of 'humanized landscapes, the conservation of heritage landscapes with its implications for the development of rural tourism, and climate change and variability. Several of these domains represent the recognition that agricultural land and farming activities can also be multi-functional and are able to support other functions (if of course, the actors decide that these other functions are important for their territory).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it