MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785529673 · doi:10.56255/ma.v0i15.102

Biomateriales y tecnologías para una nueva arquitectura

2017· article· es· W2785529673 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Blanchet

Bibliographic record

VenueMateria Arquitectura · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los proyectos de construcción de gran altura en madera se multiplican a un ritmo importante en todo el planeta. Entre los proyectos en marcha y los que se encuentran en proceso de concepción, encontramos distintos tipos de edificios. Actualmente existe una especie de carrera entre los países por construir el proyecto más innovador en madera. Este artículo propone una revisión de las soluciones de construcción disponibles, pero también de las soluciones del futuro para la construcción con madera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMateria ArquitecturaSame topicArchitecture and Computational DesignFrench-language works237,207