MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785550642 · doi:10.1039/c7pp90043k

Environmental effects of ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2017

2018· article· en· W2785550642 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alkiviadis Bais, Robyn Lucas, Janet F. Bornman, Craig E. Williamson, Barbara Sulzberger, Amy T. Austin, Stephen R. Wilson, Anthony L. Andrady, G. Bernhard, Richard McKenzie, P. J. Aucamp, S. Madronich, Rachel Ε. Neale, Seyhan Yazar, Antony R. Young, Frank R. de Gruijl, Mary Norval, Y. Takizawa, Paul W. Barnes, T. Matthew Robson, Sharon A. Robinson, C. L. Bailaré, Stephan D. Flint, Patrick J. Neale, Samuel Hylander, Kevin C. Rose, Sten‐Åke Wängberg, Donat‐Peter Häder, Robert C. Worrest, Richard G. Zepp, N. D. Paul, Rose M. Cory, Keith R. Solomon, Janice Longstreth, Krishna K. Pandey, Halim Hamid Redhwi, Ayako Torikai, Anu Heikkilä

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotochemical & Photobiological Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilUniversity of MiamiNew Zealand GovernmentUniversity of WollongongDivision of Environmental BiologyMinistry of Business, Innovation and EmploymentHavs- och VattenmyndighetenBundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und ReaktorsicherheitGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyHelsingin YliopistoU.S. Environmental Protection AgencySmithsonian InstitutionNaturvårdsverketNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMontreal ProtocolOzone layerClimate changeOzone depletionEnvironmental scienceUltraviolet radiationOzoneMeteorologyClimatologyGeographyEcologyChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations351
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePhotochemical & Photobiological SciencesSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207