MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785850540 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2017.8292552

Performance comparison of constant envelope DCT- and FFT-based OFDM systems with phase modulation over frequency-nonselective fading channels

2017· article· en· W2785850540 on OpenAlex
Rayan Hamza Alsisi, Raveendra K. Rao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersIslamic University of Madinah
KeywordsRician fadingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFast Fourier transformFadingBit error rateModulation (music)Rayleigh fadingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEnvelope (radar)AmplifierTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmBandwidth (computing)PhysicsAcousticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, DCT- and FFT-based constant envelope multicarrier systems with M-PAM mapper are considered. The phase modulation used in these systems to achieve constant envelope results in 0 dB PAPR thereby permitting high power amplifiers to operate with maximum power efficiency. Closed-form expressions for bit error rate are derived for both systems for Rayleigh and Rician fading channels. It is noted that constant envelope DCT-based OFDM system outperforms in terms of bit error rate corresponding to FFT-based OFDM system. Also, it is shown that theoretical bit error rate is nearly the same as that of simulation results, particularly for small values of modulation index at all SNRs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207