MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785893835 · doi:10.2134/agronj2017.07.0406

Streaming Urea Ammonium Nitrate with or without Enhanced Efficiency Products Impacted Corn Yields, Ammonia, and Nitrous Oxide Emissions

2018· article· en· W2785893835 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Woodley, C. F. Drury, X.M. Yang, W. D. Reynolds, W. Calder, T. O. Oloya

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPolymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUreaChemistryAmmoniumUreaseNitrificationNitrateAmmonia volatilization from ureaAmmoniaFertilizerAmmonium nitrateNitrogenNitrous oxideInorganic chemistryEnvironmental chemistryAgronomyBiochemistryOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas Streaming urea ammonium nitrate resulted in 11% lower corn yields compared to injected urea ammonium nitrate. Ammonia volatilization (NH3) begins immediately after application for streaming urea ammonium nitrate. In 2015–2016, NH3 loss was 3.6 fold greater for streaming urea ammonium nitrate compared to injected urea ammonium nitrate. Urease and nitrification inhibitors did not increase corn yields with streaming urea ammonium nitrate. Streaming urea ammonium nitrate with a urease inhibitor increased N2O emissions by 18.7%. Surface streaming urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) into corn (Zea mays L.) at side‐dress (v4–v6) or later in the season (v12–v14) is an emerging N fertilizer application method as it is rapid, reduces soil disturbance, and allows for flexible application times. In 2013 and 2014, side‐dress N application (130 kg N ha−1) using three streaming UAN sources was evaluated for their ability to maintain grain yield, reduce ammonia (NH3) volatilization, and mitigate nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. The products included streaming of urea ammonium nitrate (StrUAN), urea ammonium nitrate with a urease inhibitor (StrUAN‐UI), urea ammonium nitrate with urease inhibitor plus nitrification inhibitor (StrUAN‐UI+NI), and a control (no N). The efficacy of streaming relative to traditional shallow‐injected urea ammonium nitrate (InjUAN) was also assessed. Delayed NH3 sampling related to wind‐tunnel installation in 2013 and 2014 led to additional NH3 measurements in 2015 and 2016. Average yields from StrUAN were 11% lower relative to InjUAN. The use of inhibitors did not improve yields relative to StrUAN. Ammonia volatilization was not significantly different between StrUAN and InjUAN losing 14 and 20% of applied N (2‐yr average), respectively. However in 2015 and 2016, NH3 volatilization from StrUAN was 3.6‐fold greater than InjUAN when measurements were started immediately after application. Hence lower yields in 2013 and 2014 from StrUAN likely reflect N loss to rapid volatilization during or shortly after application. The StrUAN‐UI treatment increased 2‐yr average N2O emissions by 17.3 to 18.7% relative to StrUAN or StrUAN‐UI+NI. For humid‐temperate clay loam soil, UAN streaming with/without inhibitors was not effective for maintaining yields or reducing NH3 volatilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomy JournalSame topicPolymer-Based Agricultural EnhancementsFrench-language works237,207